Like a Dragon: 10 Reasons Why the Live-Action Show Misses the Mark on Yakuza Drama

Spoiler Warning: This review includes significant plot details that may reveal crucial moments of the series.

Like a Dragon: Promising Start but Lacking the Grit and Depth of a True Yakuza Drama

Like a Dragon Live Action Show begins with the promise of high-stakes intrigue and thrilling action, set against the atmospheric, neon-lit streets of Japan’s underworld. The series attempts to capture the intense drama of Yakuza life, immersing viewers in a world filled with organized crime, loyalty, and betrayal. For anyone fascinated by Japanese culture and the unique depth that Yakuza stories can offer, the show’s premise feels enticing—a chance to witness a layered, action-packed narrative come to life onscreen.

However, after watching the first episode, I found that Like a Dragon struggles to deliver the authenticity and grit that define the Yakuza genre. The 13+ rating restricts the series from exploring the dark, complex themes essential to a compelling Yakuza story, and the portrayal of Kazuma, the protagonist, lacks the depth and stoicism fans might expect, making it hard to connect with him, especially for those familiar with the games. The heist scenes and group dynamics lean into a lighter, almost whimsical style that feels out of sync with the serious tone, further detracting from the narrative’s impact.

As a longtime fan of Japanese culture—from my childhood memories of classic anime to the cultural nuances I admired on a trip to Japan—Like a Dragon left me hoping for more substance. While there are glimmers of potential, such as insights into Kazuma’s orphaned youth and tense Yakuza encounters, the episode felt rushed, with transitions that undermine the story’s suspense and emotional depth. In the end, Like a Dragon Live Action Show doesn’t fully capture the richness of the Yakuza world, and I won’t be continuing the series.

1. Like a Dragon Live Action Show Struggles to Capture the Dark World of Yakuza

From the outset, Like a Dragon Live Action Show makes a critical misstep with its surprisingly low 13+ rating—a choice that holds the series back from delving into the raw, mature themes essential to Yakuza storytelling. The Yakuza genre is defined by its deep dives into loyalty, betrayal, and violence, with a level of gritty realism that explores the human cost of life in the criminal underworld.

By aiming at a younger audience, Like a Dragon limits itself, unable to fully explore the intense adult themes that give these stories their emotional weight. This restriction leaves the world of Yakuza feeling sanitized and, at times, almost trivial, failing to capture the dark, high-stakes world that is central to the genre.

Unlike mature-rated series like Tokyo Vice, which doesn’t shy away from depicting the brutality and psychological toll of crime in Japan’s underbelly, Like a Dragon feels watered down and restrained. The lower rating means the show can’t fully portray the real, harrowing consequences of Yakuza life or the nuanced conflicts that arise from loyalty to a criminal family.

It avoids exploring scenes of intense violence, psychological manipulation, or the inevitable moral gray areas that define life within organized crime. These elements, essential to Yakuza drama, are noticeably toned down or entirely absent, resulting in a portrayal that feels almost superficial compared to the raw intensity that fans of the genre expect.

For viewers who are drawn to Yakuza stories because of their complexity and hard-hitting themes, this choice diminishes the show’s impact. Without the realistic, unfiltered look at Japan’s criminal underworld, Like a Dragon lacks the gravity and tension of a true crime drama, weakening its ability to resonate with audiences who are seeking the same intensity and authenticity found in other Yakuza-focused stories. As a result, the show’s portrayal of Yakuza life feels out of place, making it difficult to take seriously and leaving fans wanting more from what could have been a compelling adaptation.

2. Missed Character Depth Leaves Kazuma’s Storyline Shallow

The Like a Dragon Live Action Show brings familiar names like Kazuma and Nishiki to the screen, but it misses crucial opportunities to delve into their complex backstories, leaving their characters feeling underdeveloped and distant. Kazuma’s life as an orphan, for example, is filled with potential for emotional depth, especially given his relationship with Kazama-san, the older figure who raised him and his fellow orphans.

Kazama-san has sacrificed parts of himself for these children, but the show glosses over this dynamic, offering only fleeting glimpses of Kazuma’s nostalgia and desire to escape his past life. Instead of exploring Kazuma’s emotional ties to his adoptive family and his struggles within this environment, the series merely hints at these elements, failing to build the connection needed for viewers to become truly invested in his journey.

In one of the early scenes, we see Kazuma reflecting on his orphanage life, yet the portrayal feels rushed, as if simply marking a character note rather than building meaningful layers to his personality. His aspirations and his longing to leave this life behind come off as generic and unmotivated due to the lack of background that could otherwise make his decisions resonate. This oversight becomes a significant flaw, as Yakuza dramas thrive on the complexity of personal relationships and the weight they carry within the criminal world.

Kazuma’s bond with Kazama-san, which could have added a compelling father-son dynamic, remains shallow. Kazama-san’s role in raising Kazuma and the others, his sacrifices, and the consequences he has faced, such as losing a finger to protect them, are touched upon but never fully developed. The show misses the opportunity to explore Kazuma’s loyalty, his gratitude, or even any conflict he might feel toward Kazama-san, leaving these significant aspects of his character largely unexamined.

As a result, viewers are left with a version of Kazuma that feels one-dimensional—a young man driven by vague motivations without the depth of personal history that would make his choices meaningful. For fans familiar with Kazuma’s story from the games, this lack of character exploration can be frustrating, as they know there is far more to Kazuma than what the show portrays.

His relationship with Kazama-san should be foundational to his character, shaping his motivations and decisions within the Yakuza world, but instead, it’s barely scratched, leaving audiences unable to connect deeply with Kazuma’s character and journey.

3. An Awkward, Lighthearted Heist Sequence That Misses the Mark

The Like a Dragon Live Action Show opens with a heist sequence that initially promises excitement and tension, but the tone quickly takes a surprising turn into lighthearted territory, veering into an almost comic, whimsical style that feels more like Scott Pilgrim vs. The World than a Yakuza thriller.

Instead of the gritty suspense and high-stakes tension that fans might expect, the heist is carried out by a ragtag group of thieves—each introduced with quirky, stylized text overlays that give their names and roles, such as Yumi the lookout and Miho the pickpocket. This upbeat, almost playful approach to introducing these characters and the heist itself creates a tonal mismatch that feels jarring for viewers familiar with the darker, more serious nature of Yakuza stories.

As the heist unfolds, scenes that should be filled with suspense feel undercut by a playful energy that detracts from the gravity of the moment. For example, we see Yumi stationed with binoculars, her camouflage hat and outfit adding a comic flair rather than establishing her as a critical part of a dangerous operation.

Miho, the pickpocket, sneaks around with exaggerated stealth that seems more fitting in a heist parody. Even the sequence where Kazuma and Nishiki fight their way through a chaotic spray of sprinklers and gunfire feels more lighthearted than intense, almost as though the creators were aiming for a slapstick, adrenaline-filled escape rather than a life-or-death encounter.

This approach leaves the opening feeling like a series of set pieces strung together with little regard for the tension or stakes expected in a Yakuza storyline. Rather than setting the stage for a high-stakes criminal drama, this lighthearted heist introduces the story in a way that feels at odds with the darker, more complex world that fans of Yakuza stories anticipate.

The whimsical tone diminishes the dramatic potential of Kazuma and his crew’s introduction, and as a result, viewers miss out on a compelling look into the challenges and relationships within this group. Instead of building an intense, immersive entry into the Yakuza world, the show starts with a scene that feels out of place, disrupting the dramatic tone and potentially leaving fans questioning the direction of the series.

4. Inconsistent Voice Acting Strips Kazuma of His Stoic Personality

In the Like a Dragon Live Action Show, Kazuma is brought to life in the English dub with a youthful, upbeat voice that diverges significantly from the stoic, hardened character fans have come to expect. This vocal choice is reminiscent of Ichiban from later games in the franchise, creating an odd disconnect for long-time fans who know Kazuma as a reserved, composed figure. The portrayal leans into a boyish enthusiasm that feels at odds with Kazuma’s history and character arc as a serious, thoughtful protagonist shaped by hardship and the gritty underbelly of the Yakuza world.

This voice casting choice does more than simply change Kazuma’s tone—it fundamentally alters how his character is perceived. Instead of conveying the weight of someone who’s lived through betrayal, loyalty tests, and moral struggles within Japan’s criminal underground, Kazuma’s voice feels almost inexperienced, taking away the gravity and maturity that should define his character.

The voice acting ultimately weakens Kazuma’s presence, making him seem less like the composed anti-hero of the Yakuza series and more like an inexperienced, eager protagonist, which undercuts the sense of intrigue and authority he should naturally bring to the screen.

For fans familiar with the Yakuza franchise, Kazuma’s personality is iconic—he is the silent, focused force who moves through chaos with a quiet resolve. This deviation from his established persona can feel jarring, especially in moments where Kazuma is expected to exude calm under pressure or convey depth with minimal words. Instead, the vocal portrayal shifts these moments into something less impactful, even bordering on upbeat and lighthearted, which is inconsistent with the character’s established tone in the series.

While this youthful spin might appeal to newcomers unfamiliar with the games, for long-time fans, the deviation is hard to ignore and may even distract from the plot. For a character as central as Kazuma, who serves as the emotional anchor of the series, this inconsistent portrayal risks alienating core fans, making it difficult to view Kazuma as the seasoned, morally complex figure they expect. This misalignment in tone ultimately undermines the authenticity of Like a Dragon Live Action Show as an adaptation, leaving fans yearning for the stoic Kazuma they know from the games.

5. A Lackluster Emotional Payoff for Key Scenes

The Like a Dragon Live Action Show attempts to layer its story with moments of sympathy and tension, but many of these scenes miss the mark, lacking the emotional depth that would make them truly resonate. One such moment involves Kazuma’s group overhearing Kazama-san’s sacrifices on their behalf, a scene meant to evoke both gratitude and guilt among the orphans.

However, the moment falls flat due to a lack of context and proper buildup. Without understanding the nuances of Kazuma’s relationship with Kazama-san, viewers are left with a scene that feels forced rather than heart-wrenching.

Kazama-san, who acts as a father figure for Kazuma and the other orphans, has clearly endured hardship, even going as far as sacrificing his own pinky—a symbolic gesture within Yakuza culture that represents atonement and loyalty—to protect them from the consequences of their actions.

This moment could have been a turning point, showing the profound sacrifices Kazama-san has made and creating a stronger bond between him and Kazuma. However, with the story glossing over the characters’ shared history, Kazama-san’s gesture feels hollow, more like an obligatory plot point than an emotional revelation.

Adding to the disconnect is the underdeveloped hint of a past abusive relationship between Kazuma and Kazama-san. This element could have added another layer to their complex dynamic, offering viewers insight into Kazuma’s conflicting feelings toward his father figure—perhaps a mixture of gratitude, resentment, and obligation.

Yet, this backstory is merely touched upon, lacking the depth needed to make the audience feel the weight of their history. Instead of being invested in Kazuma’s internal struggle, viewers are left detached, unable to fully understand or empathize with his journey.

When Kazama-san reveals his missing pinky, the show could have used this moment to give Kazuma a greater emotional arc, allowing him to grapple with feelings of loyalty and guilt. Instead, the moment lacks the gravitas it needs, leaving viewers with only a surface-level understanding of Kazuma’s relationship with Kazama-san.

For a Yakuza story, where loyalty and sacrifice often carry life-or-death stakes, missing these emotional cues means missing a crucial part of what makes the genre compelling. The absence of these deeper connections results in a narrative that feels incomplete, diminishing the impact of Kazuma’s personal journey and making it difficult for viewers to become truly invested in the characters’ fates.

As it stands, these key scenes fail to deliver an emotional payoff, leaving audiences feeling detached from Kazuma’s struggles and relationships. For fans of the Yakuza genre, where every gesture and sacrifice should carry profound weight, Like a Dragon Live Action Show misses an opportunity to anchor its story in the powerful bonds and betrayals that define Yakuza tales.

6. An Uneven Pacing that Undermines Suspense

The Like a Dragon Live Action Show struggles with pacing that oscillates awkwardly between intense, high-stakes moments and slower, mundane scenes, leaving the storyline feeling disjointed and lacking momentum. This uneven pacing creates a fragmented viewing experience that disrupts the natural flow of the narrative, making it difficult for viewers to fully immerse themselves in Kazuma’s world.

For example, the show kicks off with a fast-paced heist scene filled with energy and action, setting up a tone of danger and excitement. However, immediately following this heist, the story shifts abruptly to a quiet, almost trivial montage at the orphanage, where we see Kazuma completing chores like shoveling pig manure. This jarring transition from action to quiet, everyday tasks not only breaks the suspense but also diminishes the impact of the previous scenes, leaving viewers feeling disoriented rather than engrossed.

This back-and-forth pacing persists throughout the series, with abrupt shifts between action-packed moments and character-building scenes that feel oddly placed. The result is a lack of rhythm in the storytelling, making it challenging for viewers to remain engaged.

Instead of gradually building tension through a balanced blend of suspenseful and reflective moments, the series delivers peaks and valleys that feel random and unintentional. The lack of strategic pacing prevents any real anticipation from developing, and scenes that should be tense or meaningful fall flat as a result.

In contrast, shows like Tokyo Vice use pacing as a tool to heighten suspense and draw the audience in. By allowing certain scenes to unfold slowly and naturally, Tokyo Vice builds a simmering tension that leaves viewers eager to see what happens next.

Like a Dragon, however, rushes through pivotal scenes without giving them room to breathe, while stretching out moments that feel unnecessary or trivial. This pacing issue undermines the narrative’s ability to create a compelling, immersive experience, reducing the emotional and psychological depth that’s vital to a Yakuza story.

Furthermore, the frequent shifts in pacing make it challenging for viewers to connect with the characters. Kazuma’s journey, in particular, could have been enhanced by a more deliberate pacing strategy that allows audiences to experience his inner conflict and struggles with greater clarity.

Instead, the rapid shifts from action to calm prevent viewers from fully absorbing Kazuma’s emotions or understanding his motivations. This inconsistent pacing ultimately weakens the storytelling, as it fails to sustain the suspense and emotional impact that are essential for a gripping Yakuza narrative.

Without a cohesive flow, Like a Dragon Live Action Show falls short of the steady, calculated momentum seen in similar dramas, leaving viewers with a series that feels less like an immersive crime drama and more like a collection of disjointed scenes. This lack of finesse in pacing not only detracts from the plot but also makes it difficult for audiences to invest in Kazuma’s journey, as the story fails to maintain the suspense and engagement that viewers expect from a Yakuza-inspired show.

7. Limited Cultural Depth Compared to Other Yakuza Dramas

One of the defining strengths of Tokyo Vice is its meticulous attention to Japanese culture and Yakuza customs, which grants viewers an immersive look into Japan’s underworld, filled with nuanced social dynamics, unspoken rules, and unique rituals. Like a Dragon Live Action Show, however, falls short in delivering this cultural authenticity, glossing over the rich, complex backdrop that gives Yakuza dramas their distinctive allure.

While the show introduces characters with some Japanese nuances and settings that visually resemble Tokyo’s bustling neighborhoods, it lacks the depth required to pull viewers fully into the layered world of Yakuza society. The result is a portrayal that feels somewhat superficial, missing out on the authentic subtleties that could make it a compelling window into Japanese organized crime.

In Tokyo Vice, for instance, we see the unspoken hierarchy and respect between members, the careful etiquette practiced during interactions, and the constant push-pull between duty and personal freedom within the Yakuza. These cultural layers create a more vivid, immersive experience, making viewers feel as though they are privy to an inside look at this hidden world. The show dives into the psychology of loyalty and betrayal, the importance of maintaining “face,” and the implicit rules governing the Yakuza, which elevate the story beyond a typical crime thriller.

Like a Dragon, however, does not capitalize on these cultural nuances. Scenes that could serve as a window into the unique traditions, rituals, or even the moral code of the Yakuza instead play out with a more generic, universal approach that lacks cultural specificity. For instance, there’s little exploration of the sense of duty and honor that often define Yakuza interactions or the subtle, culturally-rooted gestures that showcase respect and hierarchy.

Even symbolic elements, like Kazama-san’s pinky amputation, which carries profound meaning in Yakuza culture as an act of atonement, are not fully contextualized or explored, making the show feel more like a Western interpretation of Yakuza stories than an authentic portrayal of Japan’s underworld.

For audiences who appreciate Yakuza dramas because of their cultural intricacies and insider view of Japanese life, Like a Dragon misses an opportunity to distinguish itself. The lack of cultural depth makes it challenging to connect with the characters and their motivations on a cultural level, leaving viewers with a story that feels somewhat out of touch with the roots of the genre.

This absence of authenticity dilutes the impact of key scenes and characters, reducing the story to something more superficial and accessible but ultimately less rewarding for fans seeking a truly immersive experience.

By neglecting the cultural dimension that gives Yakuza dramas their richness, Like a Dragon Live Action Show struggles to resonate with viewers who are drawn to the complexities of Japanese organized crime. Instead, it provides only a surface-level look into the Yakuza, ultimately making it feel less immersive and harder to connect with for those who expect the depth and authenticity found in shows like Tokyo Vice.

8. Visuals that Don’t Capture the Grit of the Genre

Like a Dragon Live Action Show attempts to captivate viewers with its visuals, featuring some striking shots of neon-lit streets and even a CGI dragon in the credit sequence. However, despite these elements, the show falls short of creating the fully immersive quality that’s essential for a compelling Yakuza drama.

The action scenes, though packed with choreography, often feel staged rather than gritty and organic, leaving little room for viewers to feel genuinely engaged with the story. While it’s clear that effort was made to bring the vibrant, chaotic streets of Kamurocho to life, the cinematography lacks the depth and texture that would allow these scenes to evoke an emotional response or connect with the intensity of the Yakuza world.

In a city as dynamic as Kamurocho, where bustling alleyways and neon signage create a unique and atmospheric setting, the visuals could have been a powerful tool for storytelling. However, Like a Dragon relies heavily on staged camera setups and wide shots that, while visually clean, keep the viewer at a distance. The show misses the chance to use close-ups and more intimate camera angles to convey the tension, claustrophobia, and ever-present danger that define Yakuza dramas.

By comparison, Tokyo Vice employs handheld cameras and tight angles to put viewers right in the middle of the action, using cinematography to make every scene feel personal and immediate. This style gives viewers the sense that they’re not just watching a story unfold but are instead immersed in the world itself, experiencing each moment alongside the characters.

The difference in cinematographic approach means that Like a Dragon feels almost too polished, lacking the gritty realism that could have elevated its portrayal of Kazuma’s world. Even during high-stakes scenes, such as fights or chases, the overly choreographed feel makes it hard to suspend disbelief and truly feel the weight of the moment.

For instance, in the heist sequence, the lack of dynamic, handheld shots fails to capture the chaos and suspense one would expect in a situation filled with risk and tension. This overly staged feel diminishes the sense of urgency, making scenes that should be gripping instead feel more like set pieces than lived experiences.

Without the textured, immersive cinematography seen in similar shows, Like a Dragon keeps its viewers at a distance, preventing them from becoming fully absorbed in the world of Kazuma and the Yakuza. For a show grounded in a culture where every glance, movement, and setting should carry a weight of significance, this lack of visual depth reduces the impact of the story.

The result is a viewing experience that feels visually appealing on the surface but lacks the authenticity and intensity that could have made it truly memorable. Fans looking for the visual grit and raw energy of a true Yakuza tale may find themselves left wanting, as Like a Dragon ultimately misses the mark in translating the textured world of Japanese crime drama to the screen.

9. Over-Reliance on Flashbacks and Voiceovers

Like a Dragon Live Action Show leans heavily on flashbacks and voiceovers as storytelling devices, a choice that ultimately weakens its narrative impact. While flashbacks and voiceovers can be effective tools for providing backstory and context when used sparingly, the show relies on them so frequently that they become a crutch, making the storytelling feel repetitive and overly expository.

For example, flashbacks to Kazuma’s youth are intended to shed light on his motivations and formative experiences, yet they are deployed with such frequency that they begin to lose their impact, reducing what could have been powerful revelations into mere background filler.

In scenes where Kazuma’s voiceovers offer insight into his thoughts, these moments feel like shortcuts to convey his internal struggles rather than allowing viewers to understand him through his actions and interactions. These voiceovers narrate his motivations and feelings in a way that feels overly direct, robbing the viewer of the chance to witness Kazuma’s journey organically.

For fans of Yakuza stories, where characters’ motivations are often revealed subtly through dialogue, facial expressions, and complex relationships, this heavy-handed approach can feel like it’s spoon-feeding the audience. Instead of enhancing Kazuma’s character, these constant intrusions disrupt the narrative flow, making it difficult to become fully engaged in his story.

The flashbacks, intended to flesh out Kazuma’s past, could have been powerful tools for deepening his character if they had been woven in more thoughtfully. Moments such as glimpses of Kazuma’s orphaned youth or memories of his complex relationship with Kazama-san could have been shown with more nuance and restraint, allowing viewers to piece together Kazuma’s background gradually.

Instead, the show repeatedly jumps back to these moments, almost as if trying to fill in gaps that should have been addressed through stronger in-the-moment storytelling. The excessive use of these flashbacks gives the impression that the show doesn’t trust its viewers to follow the story on their own, resulting in a narrative that feels more like a series of pieced-together memories than a cohesive, unfolding plot.

When compared to similar series like Tokyo Vice, which allows tension and character depth to build organically, Like a Dragon’s over-reliance on flashbacks and voiceovers feels clumsy and forced. In Tokyo Vice, for instance, viewers are shown hints of characters’ pasts and motivations in subtle, meaningful ways, allowing the audience to feel invested in uncovering the layers of each character. Like a Dragon misses this opportunity, resorting to these devices in a way that feels almost intrusive, as if the show is continuously interrupting itself to explain instead of letting the story speak naturally.

Ultimately, the constant flashbacks and voiceovers make Like a Dragon Live Action Show feel fragmented, breaking up what could have been a cohesive narrative into disjointed segments. Rather than adding depth, they detract from the story’s flow and undermine the emotional resonance that comes from discovering characters through their actions and interactions.

For viewers expecting a dynamic, character-driven Yakuza drama, the show’s reliance on these shortcuts ends up being a distraction, preventing the story from reaching its full potential and leaving audiences yearning for a more immersive, thoughtful approach to Kazuma’s journey.

10. Cheesy Soundtrack Choices Undermine the Drama

One of the most glaring missteps in Like a Dragon Live Action Show is its ill-suited soundtrack, which frequently relies on upbeat, triumphant music in moments that demand tension and gravity. This overuse of celebratory, almost campy music during intense scenes creates a tonal disconnect that can pull viewers out of the experience, diluting the show’s atmosphere.

For example, in a high-stakes fight sequence between Kazuma and a hulking opponent, rather than heightening the danger or showcasing the brutal nature of the encounter, the background music shifts to an upbeat, almost victorious tune, unintentionally undercutting the intensity of the scene.

In any well-crafted crime drama, the soundtrack should act as an invisible thread, reinforcing the mood and amplifying the emotional weight of each moment. But in Like a Dragon, the choice of music often clashes with the tone, giving pivotal scenes an unintended lightheartedness. This issue arises repeatedly throughout the series, with moments that should feel suspenseful or dramatic being reduced to near-parody by the mismatched score.

When a fight breaks out, for instance, the music choice should make viewers feel the stakes, immersing them in the physical and emotional risks. Instead, the soundtrack’s upbeat, celebratory tone removes any sense of danger or urgency, transforming what should be a raw, suspenseful encounter into something almost playful.

This tonal dissonance creates an atmosphere that feels far less serious than the subject matter demands, making it difficult to take key scenes seriously. The soundtrack not only misinterprets the emotional needs of each scene but also works against the narrative’s attempts to build suspense.

In a Yakuza drama, where every encounter could mean life or death, the music should emphasize the ever-present tension and looming threats. Instead, the upbeat tunes make these situations feel as though the stakes are low, diminishing the sense of immersion crucial for a show steeped in the high-stakes world of organized crime.

For fans of Yakuza stories, this musical choice is especially disappointing, as it undermines the gritty, emotionally charged atmosphere that defines the genre. Where a well-chosen soundtrack could have elevated Kazuma’s struggles and triumphs, the music in Like a Dragon often detracts, adding an unintended layer of cheesiness that trivializes otherwise serious moments.

In contrast, shows like Tokyo Vice utilize restrained, atmospheric soundtracks that deepen the emotional experience, enhancing the weight of each scene without overshadowing it. This approach allows viewers to feel the full impact of each moment, intensifying the drama and immersing them in the world of the characters.

By choosing music that fails to match the story’s tone, Like a Dragon Live Action Show misses an essential element that could have added to its emotional depth. Instead of allowing viewers to lose themselves in the suspense and seriousness of Kazuma’s journey, the soundtrack repeatedly disrupts the atmosphere, making scenes feel superficial and robbing them of the dramatic power they deserve.

This misstep is more than a minor distraction—it compromises the entire viewing experience, leaving audiences craving a more cohesive, immersive musical accompaniment that aligns with the intense world of the Yakuza.

Conclusion: A Missed Opportunity for Yakuza Fans Seeking Depth and Authenticity

Like a Dragon Live Action Show has moments of intrigue and action, with glimmers of potential that hint at a more compelling story. However, as a fan of Japanese culture and the Yakuza genre, I find myself disappointed. From inconsistent tone and voice acting to a lack of emotional weight, the show doesn’t live up to the legacy of the games or match the intensity of Tokyo Vice. While it may appeal to viewers unfamiliar with the Yakuza franchise, seasoned fans of the genre may struggle to find the depth and grit they’re looking for.

Click here for my latest blog posts!