Amazon Prime Election Coverage with Brian Williams: Why Cutting the Cord Is Becoming a No-Brainer

Amazon Prime Election Coverage: Reinforcing the Case for Cutting the Cord

After two weeks without my YouTube TV subscription, I’m already convinced that cutting the traditional TV cord is one of the easiest choices I’ve made. I was spending $80 a month, adding up to over $900 a year – and for what? While there are moments when I miss live events, like sports or catching Get Up on ESPN, the freedom from that hefty price tag is worth it. So far, I haven’t found many reasons to go back, and this election season only reinforced my decision.

Heading into election night, I wondered if I’d regret not having access to the kind of polished, live news coverage that cable channels like Fox News or CNN provide. Instead, I was pleasantly surprised to see Amazon Prime stepping in with its own election night coverage led by Brian Williams. It’s part of a broader trend: streaming giants like Amazon and Netflix are starting to offer live content, filling the gaps that cable once dominated. As these platforms expand their live programming, cutting the cord feels not only manageable but preferable, making traditional TV seem more unnecessary by the day.

Amazon’s move here was refreshing for those of us who’ve canceled traditional TV plans but still crave more than a low-budget YouTube stream. It’s also a reminder that Amazon Prime is stepping up its game with live programming. They’ve already dipped into live sports with Thursday Night Football, and Netflix, too, is starting to experiment with live events. It seems like these streaming giants are gradually filling the gaps that cable once owned, giving us a little more reason to believe that “cutting the cord” really could cover all the bases.

One of the highlights of Amazon’s election coverage was the presence of Brian Williams as the lead anchor. Williams is a well-known, seasoned journalist who has been In the industry for decades. Though his exit from NBC was a bit controversial – he was criticized for embellishing some Iraq war coverage about a helicopter incident – that hasn’t diminished his credibility for many viewers, including myself. Watching him cover election night on Amazon was a reminder of the caliber of news coverage we’re used to from TV. I was glad to see a trusted journalist at the helm, which made Amazon’s broadcast feel legitimate and reliable.

The set Amazon used for this coverage really stood out as well. It felt very professional – spacious, with an impressive display of graphics behind the anchors. At one point, the graphics on the set turned off, revealing gray walls behind them. I’m not sure if it was intentional or a technical glitch, but it gave an interesting look at how versatile the setup is. The graphics Amazon used to display text on-screen had a bit of a quirky look, maybe not as polished as traditional news channels, but overall, it was an impressive production.

I don’t know if this is Amazon’s first time trying live news coverage, but they did a solid job here. It makes me hope that Amazon and even Netflix might continue exploring this space, especially if they consider expanding into live news more regularly. The potential for these streaming platforms to make traditional TV obsolete is exciting, especially if we can get news, sports, and live events through services we’re already subscribed to. For now, Amazon’s election night coverage has been a promising step in that direction.

A New Take on Election Coverage: Relaxed, Balanced, and Visually Impressive

One thing that really caught my attention was the large mural behind the anchors and guests. It’s massive and packed with iconic images of American landmarks and landscapes. Amazon’s design team really went all out on this visual element. The mural spans various scenes, from the Seattle Space Needle and city skyline to San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge.

It even includes Washington, D.C., Mount Rushmore, and a cool, wide shot of a cornfield. These visuals are striking and give the set a patriotic, almost cinematic feel that instantly pulls you in. It’s refreshing to see Amazon paying this much attention to detail, making the setting as captivating as the coverage itself.

Another aspect I found surprising and enjoyable was Brian Williams’ approach throughout the evening. I haven’t really watched much of his work in the past—only knowing that he used to anchor at NBC. Watching him here, I was struck by how relaxed he seemed.

He brought a certain energy and humor to the coverage that you don’t often see in traditional news broadcasts. He even threw in a few light-hearted jokes, giving the whole event a vibe that felt a little like New Year’s Eve programming. This relaxed, slightly festive tone was unexpected but added a refreshing twist to the night’s election coverage.

It was also nice to see a level of balance among the pundits featured on Amazon’s coverage. From what I observed, they brought in voices from both sides of the political spectrum—there were clearly left-leaning pundits, but there were also those with right-leaning perspectives. Given today’s environment, where news coverage often feels heavy on opinion and tends to lean distinctly one way or the other, it was refreshing to see Amazon making an effort to bring in a range of views. Even if it’s just the impression of balance, it’s something I appreciate. It’s not something you see as often on traditional news networks anymore, so Amazon’s attempt at it here is commendable.

On a personal note, as I watched Amazon experiment with original news coverage, I found myself wanting to see more of this. I did some quick research and found that this Election Night special is actually Amazon’s first big step into producing its own live news content. Traditionally, Amazon has streamed live news through third-party providers, but this marks a big change as they try their hand at producing news in-house.

Whether they’ll continue to do so is up in the air—there’s no word yet on whether Amazon will create a regular schedule of original news programming. But if the interest is there, I think it would be amazing to see Amazon explore this area more, perhaps even create a nightly news program or something similar.

Embracing a New Era of News with a Relaxed, Relatable Approach

One final observation: the relaxed atmosphere of this coverage feels like part of a more significant trend in broadcasting. I think we’re seeing news anchors and hosts across the industry become more laid-back and personable on air. ESPN’s Pat McAfee Show has really brought a different energy to sports broadcasting, where anchors are allowed to loosen up and just be themselves.

This trend might even go back further to the NBA show on TNT, where personalities like Charles Barkley and Kenny Smith brought a more casual, fun vibe to sports coverage. Amazon’s election coverage tonight felt like it drew from this same trend, letting the anchors and pundits bring more personality and a relaxed style that you wouldn’t usually see on traditional news networks. It feels like Amazon is experimenting with a new, less rigid format, and honestly, I’d be curious to see how this plays out in ratings and viewer feedback.

In the end, Amazon is tapping into something fresh here, possibly answering the demand from people looking for an alternative to mainstream, traditional news sources. There’s a real desire out there for content that’s both high-quality and professional but also feels more relatable and real. By experimenting with live programming, Amazon is showing that it’s more than capable of offering the polished production we’re used to from big-name cable news networks. In fact, streaming platforms may be better positioned than ever to provide a balanced and refreshing take on live news coverage, which could make traditional TV feel increasingly unnecessary.

Amazon and Netflix, if you’re reading this, here’s a thought: if you keep adding live programming to cover the loss of polished news broadcasts like Fox News and CNN, plus sports news networks like ESPN, and somehow even tack on local channels, all bundled with your vast VOD libraries – and make it a cheaper alternative to cable, say around $5-10 – you could truly disrupt the cable providers. Such a package would be an absolute game-changer. As more people consider cutting the cord, the streaming services willing to step up and fill the gaps in live programming could very well convince a massive audience to ditch cable for good. Traditional TV and cable providers might be facing their biggest disruptor yet.

Click here for my latest posts!